Home

RePEc ranking

Consumption Externalities and Pigouvian Ranking -- A

Rank Author Score; 1: Andrei Shleifer . Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) 3.28: 2: James J. Heckman . Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (USA) 4.5: 3: Daron Acemogl Rank: Journals: Score: Items Listed: Simple IF: Recursive IF: Discounted IF: Recursive Discounted IF: h-index: Euclid: Abstract Views: Downloads: 21: Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association: 24.23: 1689: 20: 15: 15: 14: 45: 25: 211: 201: 22: Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society: 26.19: 4262: 24: 31: 32: 34: 14: 13: 50: 41: 23: RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation: 26.2: 2119: 19: 2 For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be liste Only works listed on RePEc and claimed as theirs by registered authors are counted. A series of rankings by different criteria are aggregated. The average rank score is determined by taking a harmonic mean of the ranks in each criterion. For a list of criteria, see the general ranking page. Customize this ranking The ranking done by simply looking up the worldwide ranking for those authors or institutions from this region is provided in the W.Rank column and put in [square brackets]. Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the RePEc Author Service to be counted

Economist Rankings IDEAS/RePE

To be included in this ranking, series should have impact factor greater than 0, more than 5 citations, more than 19 documents published in the year of reference and a percentage of self citation of 50 or less. Source data used to compute the impact factor of RePEc series. Go to ranking of journals and working papers Citation analysis from items in the RePEc database. CollEc: Rankings by co-authorship centrality for authors registered in the RePEc Author Service. RePEc Biblio: Hand-selected bibliography of articles and papers in economics. RePEc Plagiarism Committee: An effort to curtail plagiarism of RePEc contents. EconAcademics.or Repec-Rankings Interne Statistiken veranschaulichen, welche Artikel die meisten Downloads haben und es wird beispielsweise ein Ranking der 25 beliebtesten der über 50.000 Autoren erstellt. Im Mai 2021 belegten Andrei Shleifer , James Heckman und Daron Acemoğlu die ersten drei Plätze Details: The following RePEc services report traffic statistics: EconPapers, IDEAS, NEP and Socionet . List of all indexed series: Working papers, journals, software components, chapters, books. Instructions for having new series indexed in RePEc. We also provide summary rankings that aggregate the various criteria. repec rankings › Verified 8 days ag

Over 14,000 economists are listed in the RePEc Genealogy. Thanks to over 3,000 contributors for their help! And help continue adding authors! Following a poll on the RePEc blog, information on RePEc Genealogy is now used to rank advisors and institutions (last 10 years of publication) The RePEc rankings are among the most visited pages of any RePEc service. While most of those rankings are still experimental and in some cases quite volatile (mostly due to incomplete citation data and not everyone being registered), they have proven to be extremely popular in the profession. While it is generally a bad idea to change definitions in the computation of rankings, sometimes there are good reasons to make adjustments or include more information. Two such changes will. The economics department of Harvard University is ranked first, followed by the World Bank and the University of Chicago. Massachusetts is the top region, followed by the United Kingdom and California. There are also rankings by country and sub-discipline

FEB Unpad Masuk Jajaran Institusi Penelitian Terbaik diInfluential economists - Shifting clout | Finance

Aggregate Rankings for Economics Journals IDEAS/RePE

Economic Institution Rankings IDEAS/RePE

This page provides links to the top US Economics departments in terms of research output, according to Richard Dusansky and Clayton J. Vernon, Rankings of U.S. Economics Departments, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol 12 (1), Winter 1998, pages 157-170. RePEc now also publishes its own ranking, which is updated monthly. Best departments first RePEc is all about the free dissemination of economic research, but for many economists it is most known for its rankings.While would really emphasize that the rankings are only a by-product and to some degree a motivator for people and publishers to have their works listed on RePEc, we want to acknowledge that the rankings have become important, as they are use for evaluations in funding. Am 5. September 2011 veröffentlichte das Handelsblatt das VWL-Ranking 2011. Der vorliegende Beitrag unterwirft die Methodik des Handelsblatts einer kurzen Kritik und vergleicht anschließend das Ranking mit demjenigen von RePEc

stellten Ranking von RePEc (Research Papers in Economics), das regelmäßig im Internet veröffentlicht wird. Alle drei Rankings unterscheiden sich nicht nur in ihrer Methodik, sondern auch in der An-zahl der Rankingkriterien deutlich. Der Artikel vergleicht die Methodik der drei Rankings und schließt damit an eini - ge frühere Artikel, die sich jeweils mit den einzelnen Rankings. Last updated July, 3 2014 639.049 documents processed, 16.613.935 references and 6.218.529 citations . Citation analysis of Journals and Working Papers. Previous editions: 2003 | Subscribe to new additions to RePEc. Author registration. Public profiles for Economics researchers. Economics Rankings. Various rankings of research in Economics & related fields. RePEc Genealogy. Who was a student of whom, using RePEc. RePEc Biblio. Curated articles & papers on various economics topics. EconAcademics. Blog aggregator for. RePEc Academic Rankings: Construction Issues and the Role of Russian Participants. Andrei Shumilov and E. Balatsky Additional contact information E. Balatsky: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia Journal of the New Economic Association, 2016, vol. 32, issue 4, 111-138 Abstract: Rapidly increasing interest of Russian academic community in. This RePEc Biblio topic is edited by Christian Zimmermann. It was first published on 2012-11-25 16:30:51 and last updated on 2012-11-26 19:15:51. Introduction by the editor While this is the first entry that has been created in the RePEc Biblio, this is not because rankings are the most pressing topic in the profession, far from that. It is.

Mutual rankings. Gabrielle Demange () . PSE Working Papers from HAL. Abstract: This paper analyzes some ranking methods in two-sided settings through their axiomatization. In these settings, there are two sets (the sides) and each member of one side evaluates each member of the other side bibliographic information RePEc calculates well-known rankings for authors and academic institutions. We provide some cautionary remarks concerning the interpretation of some provided bibliometric measures in RePEc. Moreover, we show how individual and aggregated rankings can be biased due to the employed ranking methodology. In order to select key in- dicators describing and assessing. Das RePEc-Ranking basiert vor allem auf den Zitierungen der Wissenschaftler und ihren Publikation. Ende November waren jedoch nur für etwa 25 Prozent der 1,2 Millionen Zeitschriftenartikel die Zitationen erfasst. Das ist auch der zentrale Kritikpunkt der Ifo-Forscher am RePEc-Ranking. Die Ökonomen-Rankings 2015 im Vergleich Der qualitätsgewichtete Output vom Ökonomen-Ranking im. Economics rankings: Public Policy Schools IDEAS/RePEc. Schools Details: 50 rows · For Public Policy Schools, these are 199 institutions ; Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions.Register at the RePEc Author Service to be counted. There are 8374 institutions with 62340 registered authors evaluated for all the rankings. repec.

EMU Economics Department Chair Prof

RePEc is all about the free dissemination of economic research, but for many economists it is most known for its rankings.While would really emphasize that the rankings are only a by-product and to some degree a motivator for people and publishers to have their works listed on RePEc, we want to acknowledge that the rankings have become important, as they are use for evaluations in funding. RePEc compiles its author rankings on the basis of average scores resulting from: Number of distinct works per author (different versions of the same work published in different series or journals are counted only once) Number of citations (determined from references of listed works and excluding self citations). Weighting by number of authors (the score of each work is divided by the number. As we will very soon add a new institution ranking (voting on it will soon close. Edit: The new ranking is now live), it is a good opportunity to recap how institutions can optimize how they are getting ranked in RePEc. For the existing rankings, see here. Get your authors listed, and with proper affiliation We provide some cautionary remarks on the ranking methodology employed by RePEc and show how the aggregated rankings maybe biased. Furthermore we offer a new ranking approach, based on.

  1. RePEc ranking of UC Davis among U.S. economics departments. Education Details: Jul 01, 2021 · UC Davis ranks 20th among U.S. Economics departments in ratings compiled by RePEc (Research Papers in Economics), February 2018. According to RePEc, UC Davis ranks 20th among all U.S. economics departments, and it ranks 6th among › Verified 4.
  2. Economics Rankings | IDEAS/RePEc › Best Online Courses From www.repec.org Courses. Posted: (1 week ago) This page provides links to various rankings of research in Economics and related fields. This analysis is based on data gathered with the RePEc project, in which publishers self-index their publications and authors create online profiles from the works indexed in RePEc.Citation analysis.
  3. Economics rankings: Economics Departments IDEAS/RePEc. Hospital Details: 309 rows · For Economics Departments, these are 2474 institutions ; Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the RePEc Author Service to be counted. There are 8383 institutions with 62504 registered authors evaluated for all the rankings. repec.
  4. September 24, 2020: RePEc has 60,000 registered authors. See an analysis of who they are. March 27, 2019: RePEc Blog post on Why authors should have an account with RePEc. January 21, 2016: You can now list your Twitter account on your IDEAS author profile. See how
  5. ation of economics research. Over time, various services were added to the bibliographic mission, including rankings of economists according to their publication output. Despite being still experimental (we will see why), these rankings have become quite important in the profession. This post explains how authors can best leverag

Das Handelsblatt- und das RePEc-Ranking im Vergleich. Klaus Wohlrabe () ifo Schnelldienst, 2011, vol. 64, issue 17, 66-71 Abstract: Am 5. September 2011 veröffentlichte das Handelsblatt das VWL-Ranking 2011. Der vorliegende Beitrag unterwirft die Methodik des Handelsblatts einer kurzen Kritik und vergleicht anschließend das Ranking mit. Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc. Econometrics, 2013. Michael McAleer. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package. This paper. A short summary of this paper. 37 Full PDFs related to this paper. READ PAPER. Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc . Download. Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data.

Repec-Rankings Interne Statistiken veranschaulichen, welche Artikel die meisten Downloads haben und es wird beispielsweise ein Ranking der 25 beliebtesten der über 50.000 Autoren erstellt. Im Januar 2019 belegten Andrei Shleifer , James Heckman und Daron Acemoğlu die ersten drei Plätze Ranking Economists and Economic Institutions Using RePEc: Some Remarks. Christian Seiler and Klaus Wohlrabe () . No 96, ifo Working Paper Series from ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Abstract: In socio-economic sciences the RePEc network (Research Papers in Economics) has become an essential source both for the spread of existing and new. RePEc has been providing for many years rankings of economists. These are based on a set of criteria that follows how economists like to rate themselves: where they publish, how they are cited, and how much they are read. But this is not how the rest of the universe evaluates economists. They are supposed to forecast well the path of the economy Rating of research journals enables academic institutions to evaluate research quality of scholars in a more transparent manner. An indicative Journal Quality Ranking List has been compiled in this piece of work to assist researchers to understand the academic standards of various business journals. It is a collation of journal rankings in a master scale from a variety of sources This is the code to replicate the shiny application found in IDEAS/RePEc historical rankings: Top Institutions and Journals (Aggregate rankings all years). The user can plot the ranking of each institution or journal over the last years (starting October 2013 - RePEC data format is different before.

Within Country and State Economics Rankings - IDEAS/RePE

  1. RePEc-Ranking folgen diesem Muster jedoch nicht; hier zeigt sich ein höchstens schwach ausgeprägter Zusammenhang . Besonders bedeutsam ist die Ausstattung der Professuren mit wissenschaftlichem Personal, andere Inputfaktoren spielen eine geringere Rolle. Die Analyse unterstreicht die notwendige Differenzierung bei Leistungsvergleichen und dient als Diskussi- onsanstoß für.
  2. ation of impact factors for journals an
  3. blatt-Ranking mit den Rankings von RePEC. Die Methodik des Handelsblatt-Rankings Die Publikationen der teilnehmenden Autoren werden ent-sprechend einer Zeitschriftenliste gewichtet. Diese Liste umfasst aktuell 1 517 Zeitschriften (2011 waren es 1 320 und 2010 1 265). Die aktuelle Zeitschriftengewichtung ent - spricht von der Grundidee derjenigen vom Jahr 2011, die auf einem Aufsatz von Combes.
  4. ation of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of authors, institutions, and geographic regions. The various ranking methods are also compared, using a snapshot.

RePEc : Rankings of Economics Journals and Working Paper

The IDEAS/RePEc rankings are a popular way to assess the strength of economists, serials and institutions. They are built on a large number of criteria that are relatively stable in definition. As rankings matter a lot for some, we do not want to disturb the definitions before prior approval by the community. Hence, we ar may be Repec an experienced hand that likes to trade both. One of the significant factors to consider, apart from the investment factor, is whether you will find it enjoyable and comfortable to trade and which one suits Repec your style. If you prefer the choice when it comes to assets, then binary options give you this. If you prefer to trade in currencies, then Forex could be the ideal. Repec-Rankings. Interne Statistiken veranschaulichen, welche Artikel die meisten Downloads haben und es wird beispielsweise ein Ranking der 25 beliebtesten der über 50.000 Autoren erstellt. Im Januar 2019 belegten Andrei Shleifer, James Heckman und Daron Acemoğlu die ersten drei Plätze This article describes the data collection and use of data for the computation of rankings within RePEc (Research Papers in Economics). This encompasses the determination of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of authors, institutions, and geographic regions. The various ranking methods are also compared, using a snapshot of the data

Video: RePEc: Research Papers in Economic

Research Papers in Economics - Wikipedi

Repec ranking uk Economics Rankings IDEAS/RePEc . This page provides links to various rankings of research in Economics and related fields. This analysis is based on data gathered with the RePEc project, in which publishers self-index their publications and authors create online profiles from the works indexed in RePEc.Citation analysis is performed by the CitEc project, abstract views and. Authors registered with RePEc. This page lists authors who have claimed Working Papers, Journal Articles or Software when registering in the RePEc Author Service. Persons who have not claimed any works are listed on a different page. Register yourself or update your registration in the RePEc Author Service. Abd. Majid, M. Shabri. Ahmed, Mohd If there is no local RePEc archive, follow these instructions to create one to have the local publications listed on RePEc services. More services and features. IDEAS: Economics research . All the economics literature on one site. NEP: New Economics papers. Subscribe to new additions to RePEc. Author registration. Public profiles for Economics researchers. Economics Rankings. Various rankings. RePEc rankings have become a well-established source of information about actual and perceived academic performance of institutions, academic fields and their authors. One essential ingredient are the impact factors calculated in RePEc which differ from the standard ones. RePEc reports the ratio of the cumulative citations of all articles of a journal and the number of listed items

FAZ‐Ranking einer kritischen Analyse unterworfen. Die Kritik bezieht sich sowohl auf die Einzelrankings als auch deren Aggregation. Anschließend wird das FAZ‐Ranking mit dem Handelsblatt‐Ranking und RePEc‐Ranking verglichen. Auf Basis der Kritik wird ab‐ schließend eine alternative Aggregationsmethode für die Einzelrankings vorgeschlagen. Keywords: FAZ‐Ökonomenranking, RePEc. This ranking aggregates the individual ranking methods by taking the harmonic mean of the invidual rankings (plus one), leaving aside the best and the worst ranking. IDEAS/RePEc Simple Impact Factors for Journals This list provides a simple impact factor, computing a ratio of the number of citations by the number of items in the series. May 12, 2017: RePEc is 20 years old and reached 50,000. Academic Rankings with RePEc. Christian Zimmermann () . No 2007-36, Working papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Economics Abstract: This documents describes the data collection and use for the computation of rankings within RePEc (Research Papers in Economics). This encompasses the determination of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of. Abstract. Rapidly increasing interest of Russian academic community in bibliometric systems makes it more and more important for researchers to understand properly their advantag WORKING PAPER No. 07 12/2020 Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland

Ideas Repec Ranking Mortgag

  1. Abstract: RePEc rankings have become a well-established source of information about actual and perceived academic performance of institutions, academic fields and their authors. One essential ingredient are the impact factors calculated in RePEc which differ from the standard ones. RePEc reports the ratio of the cumulative citations of all articles of a journal and the number of listed items.
  2. Access statistics for RePEc . The worlds largest collection of online Economics Working Papers, Journal Articles and Software. 416,188 File Downloads and 4,493,445 Abstract Views in August 2021. 121,382,868 File Downloads and 510,257,248 Abstract Views since January 1998
  3. A few months ago, I posted a Twitter tweet about how to use REPEC data to rank academic couples. I followed a symmetric transparent method. My criteria takes the REPEC Ranking for one spouse + REPEC ranking for the other spouse. I treat them as equals. If an economist is..

RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) est un projet collaboratif de plusieurs centaines de volontaires de 79 pays destiné à permettre la plus large diffusion de la recherche en économie [1].Le cœur du projet est constitué par une base de données de papiers de recherche, d'articles et de programmes et logiciels. Le projet a démarré en 1997, succédant à une série d'initiatives [2. LogEc collects accesses statistics from several services which use the RePEc data set, the largest online collection of Economics Working Papers, Journal Articles and Software Components. LogEc provides a convenient way of tracking trends in the profession (it can be found in RePEc before it hits the journals) and the impact of your own work RePEc Author Service에 등록된 논문으로 산정된 대학 순위 〈2017. 3월 기준〉 Rank Institution Score Authors Author shares 순위 기관 점수 저자 수 (총) 저자 점수 (총) 1 Department of Economics, Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) 하버드 대학교, 경제학과 1.17 70 58.11 2 Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT.

RePEc Genealog

  1. RePEc Biblio Welcome! Welcome to the home of the RePEc Biblio. This site brings you a hand-selected collection of the most relevant articles and papers on a wide variety of economics topics. RePEc Biblio is organized as a tree, narrowing the topics as you follow its branches. Explore it using the links in the left sidebar and, if interested.
  2. RePEc Genealogy page for Maximilian Boeck This page traces who advised whom during graduate studies for Maximilian Boeck (RePEc Genealogy, EconPapers, IDEAS).You can help amend this and other pages of this project here.You can also look at the page's history. Graduate studie
  3. RePEc plagiarism page Public discussion of this initiative. Plagiarism [...] is the wrongful appropriation, close imitation, or purloining and publication, of another author's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions, and the representation of them as one's own original work. [...] Within academia, plagiarism by students, professors, or researchers is considered academic dishonesty or.
  4. ed by the initial draw from the combined population. cross-country, nonparametric statistics, Rank-sum scoring, 68R05, 97K20, 97K80, 97M40, 05A15 4 2019 15 December Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 345 356 https.

RePEc rankings The RePEc Blog Page

This RePEc Biblio topic is edited by Richard S.J. Tol. It was first published on 2012-12-27 14:26:20 and last updated on 2012-12-27 20:29:07. Most relevant JEL codes. Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservatio This document describes the data collection and use of data for the computation of rankings within RePEc (Research Papers in Economics). This encompasses the determination of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of authors, institutions, and geographic regions. The various ranking methods are also compared, using a snapshot of the data. Research and. Lehendakari Aguirre 83, 48015 Bilbao, Spain oai:RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:16:y:1999:i:3:p:429-439 2015-08-26 RePEc:spr:sochwe article On the separability of assembly preferences Analyses of assembly elections often assume that voters have well-defined preferences over candidates, even though preferences over assemblies are the natural analytic starting point Rankings: IDEAS Repec Top 100 Economist (worldwide, 5 years or less, 2021 /07): Rank 5. IDEAS Repec Top 100 Economist (Europe, 5 years or less, 2021/07): Rank 1. IDEAS Repec Top 100 Economist (European Union, 5 years or less, 2021/07): Rank 1. IDEAS Repec Top 100 Economist (Austria, 5 years or less, 2021/07): Rank

The palettes module contains three commands: colorpalette, symbolpalette, and linepalette. The commands provide color, symbol, and line pattern palettes for use in Stata graphs. graphics, colors, marker symbols, line patterns This code is written inStata.This module should be installed from within Stata by typing ssc install palettes. The module is made available under terms of the GPL v3. Walid Abu-Dayyeh abudayyehw@yahoo.com Esam Al Sawi alsawies@kfupm.edu.sa oai:RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:51:y:2010:i:4:p:813-836 2015-08-26 RePEc:spr:stpapr article Heteroscedasticity and/or autocorrelation diagnostics in nonlinear models with AR(1) and symmetrical error Georg Stadler georgst@ices.utexas.edu oai:RePEc:spr:coopap:v:52:y:2012:i:3:p:667-689 2015-08-26 RePEc:spr:coopap article Customized simulated annealing based decision algorithms for combinatorial optimization in VLSI floorplanning proble The first is the most common spiked scenario, proposed by Johnstone, which is a central Wishart ensemble with fixed-rank perturbation of the identity matrix, the second is a non-central Wishart ensemble with fixed-rank noncentrality parameter, and the third is a similarly defined non-central F ensemble. These CLT results generalize our recent work Passemier (2015) to account for multiple. RePEc Journal Rankings, RePEc Rankings within State Georgia, John RePEc, Ijmss RePEc, Ginger RePEc, EconPapers RePEc, EconPapers, Economic Paper

RePEc Academic Rankings: Construction Issues and the Role

These studies rank as the best available direct recent evidence on the size of MPC's in the U.S. Over the years since Friedman ( 1957 ) first formulated the Permanent Income Hypothesis, a number of interesting special episodes have been examined for evidence of the size of the MPC, including one-time events like German reparations payments to Israeli citizens who suffered during the. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Liberating nations from the debt burden Rabie, Mohamed 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38810/ MPRA Paper No. 38810, posted 15 May 2012 06:27 UTC Munich Personal RePEc Archive All over the world and in most of the current society and culture, most people consider premarital sex acceptable and harmless, but the major problem of premarital is sex that. Template-Type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Title: The mean, variance and correlation for bivariate recurrent event data with a terminal event Author-Name: Thomas H. Scheike Author-Name: Fr

University rankings smarten up - econpapers

History journals in the new ranking proposed by GoogleNYU Abu Dhabi Economics Earns Prestigious Ranking – SocialThe sims resource skysims hair | the sims2 zum kleinenGrade